.png)
Family offices exist to protect wealth, preserve privacy, and keep complex household and financial operations running without disruption.
Evidence suggests that one category of risk is consistently underestimated by family offices: the actual high-net-worth people that the office serves. This is not the type of risk that’s protected by corporate IT infrastructure.
Instead, this risk lives on personal devices, in private email and social media accounts, and across the households of the different family members.
Cybercriminals have noticed this gap and have already pivoted to actively exploit it.
Much of the cybersecurity conversation in wealth management has traditionally focused on institutional controls: firewalls, encrypted networks, and compliance frameworks.
Those protections absolutely matter, but they do not extend to where a significant portion of the family office risk now lives:
- A family member checking personal email or social media account on a home network.
- A family whose phone number and home address appear in a data broker database.
- A trusted assistant using a shared device.
These are not edge cases. They are common scenarios in nearly every family served by a family office — and they represent meaningful exposure that corporate IT was never designed to address.
Due to the potential for higher reward, attackers are willing to spend months studying a target through email messages, social media posts and other types of research before acting. They also often go after finances rather than reselling stolen credentials on the dark web. The threat of ongoing reputational exposure and harm are very real and effective threat techniques.
Family offices are increasingly being targeted: 57% of North American family offices have experienced an attack in the past 12 to 24 months.
One of the most common methods is not particularly technical. Phishing and other email-based schemes are among the most prevalent and fastest-growing ways that criminals target family offices, with many of those attacks aimed at the homes of family members or employees.
More than 70% of family offices now report that the likelihood of a cyberattack has increased dramatically, according to a survey by global law firm Dentons. That figure alone should prompt a reexamination of where coverage exists — and where it does not.
The answer is not complicated. Family offices manage significant assets, often with relatively lean operational teams. Personal and professional life are closely intertwined. Lastly, the people involved — principals, family members, household staff and trusted advisors — represent a wide surface of potential entry points.
With large sums of money under management, often-lax security measures, and personal and business information intermingled on family members' devices and networks, a family office presents a target-rich environment for attackers.
Reputational damage can hit as hard as financial loss. Wealthy families often have public stature and these incidents are rarely reported publicly, making the problems harder to see and track.
Cybercriminals also frequently bypass a family office’s corporate IT systems altogether. They prefer to target leaders and their families in their personal lives, where defenses tend to be weaker.
Family offices often comprise individuals of different ages and digital habits:
- Younger kids and teenagers may click links or download apps without verifying their safety.
- Older generations are increasingly targeted through sophisticated social engineering campaigns.
- Both groups may be reluctant to speak up when they have been victimized, out of embarrassment.
This silence creates additional delay and heightened possibility of reputational and financial damage.
Cybercriminals are now using AI technologies to research, map and craft complex, drawn-out attack strategies that often include voice messages and deepfake calls.
These messages and calls can be convincing enough to make you think you are speaking to a real person — even someone you know well.
These are not abstract future threats.
They are happening now, and they are particularly effective when there is no established protocol for verifying identity under pressure.
It is worth being precise about where the coverage gap lies, because it is often misunderstood.
Most family offices have some form of IT support. What they often lack is dedicated personal cybersecurity — coverage that extends to the devices, accounts, and identities of principals and family members outside the institutional environment.
Personal devices with base-level security controls. Computers that quietly contain well-hidden malware. Data brokers who have access to compromised credentials including family members' email addresses and passwords.
These are structural gaps, not matter of individual carelessness.
The work-from-home era made this more visible.
Personal accounts, devices and computers became regular operating environments for sensitive communications, financial transactions, and professional decisions. That did not come with a corresponding upgrade in personal security posture for most households.
Risk does not stop at one individual in one family; it crosses multiple households. Every person with access to shared accounts, household computers, or sensitive communications represents a potential exposure point. Effective protection maps this landscape and monitors it across the people and devices that matter.
Human error is responsible for most cybersecurity breaches, so itis important to train family members and employees to recognize and report suspicious activity. Yet, training alone is not enough if there is no clear path forward when a concern arises.
Who do you call? What happens next? Uncertainty at that moment is costly.
This is where Richter Guardian’s human-led Cyber Defence Desk is key. Our response team is available when you want an expert answer and ongoing guidance.
Leaked credentials are a key initial attack vector for cybercriminals. It is critical for family offices and their customer – the family itself – to undergo regular security assessments to highlight gaps in their defenses.
Dark web monitoring and credential surveillance help surface exposure before it becomes a breach.
Richter Guardian reports on this exposure regularly through personalized insights, direct outreach and the Richter Guardian mobile app.
Family offices should identify a point of contact on cybersecurity and establish an incident response plan — one that lists the steps to take in the event of an attack, including details about any cyber insurance, outside legal counsel, and other external partners or resources.
When an incident occurs, calm and structured response makes a significant difference in outcome. Richter Guardian’s Cyber Defence Desk epitomizes these attributes and can help family offices with the development of a incident response plan.
For high-profile families, how a security concern is handled can matter as much as whether it is resolved. Operational scramble, visible panic, or poor communication during an incident can amplify reputational harm.
Discreet, professional support is not a luxury — it is part of what effective protection requires.
Family office managers are frequently the people who identify these gaps and are expected to address them. This is not a small responsibility.
Coordinating protection across multiple households, family members of different ages and risk profiles, and a mix of personal and professional devices and accounts. These are aspects that require a model that most IT departments were simply not built to provide.
On the other hand, Richter Guardian was designed for exactly this context.
We provide a personal cybersecurity layer for principals and households— extending beyond corporate IT to cover the personal devices, accounts, and identities that family office systems and processes do not reach.
Our approach includes:
- ongoing proactive monitoring;
- threat and vulnerability detection;
- reputation and identity protection; and
- guided incident response delivered through a concierge model built for high-net-worth family discretion and clarity.
For family office executives and managers looking to close the gap between institutional protections and personal exposure, request a private consultation to learn about where that exposure resides.
%20(1).png)
Richter Guardian gives you enterprise-level cybersecurity tailored for individuals, families, and executives.
On August 4, 2026, the claims process opened for a $8.7 million settlement of a class action against the Government of Canada.
This covered people whose personal or financial information in a Government of Canada online account, including the Canada Revenue Agency portal, was accessed without authorization in 2020.
KPMG is the court appointed administrator, and eligible class members can submit claims online or by mail until February 3, 2027.
The settlement is legitimate, but the publicity around it is exactly the conditions fraudsters look for:
That combination gives criminals a credible pretext to build convincing fake eligibility checkers and claim portals, and to harvest identity data and account credentials at scale.
A wave of phishing email, SMS, social media advertising, sponsored search results, and voice calls impersonating KPMG, the CRA, the Federal Court, and class counsel, beginning within days of the news coverage and continuing through the February 2027 claim deadline.
https://www.breachsettlementcanada.kpmg.ca (English and French). This is the court appointed administrator's website.
breachsettlementcanada@kpmg.ca
Anything arriving by unsolicited text, direct message, or phone call that pushes you toward a different address, a shortened link, or an app download should be treated as fraudulent until proven otherwise.
The following mock ups were produced by Richter Guardian for training purposes.
These are not real messages and the addresses and links shown are illustrative only.
Share them with your household, your office staff, and anyone who manages correspondence on your behalf.
Legitimate class action notice arrives by mail or from the administrator's own address.
Criminals also buy sponsored search advertisements so these pages appear above the real one.
Reach the administrator by typing the address directly - https://www.breachsettlementcanada.kpmg.ca - rather than by clicking any advertisement or search result.
The administrator contacts class members by mail or from its own domain. It will not cold call, text, or direct message you.
Real compensation is up to $80 or up to $200 for time spent, plus up to $5,000 in documented out of pocket costs, and amounts may be reduced depending on how many claims are approved. Nobody can promise you $5,000.
The real deadline is February 3, 2027. Any message giving you 24 hours, 48 hours, or "this week" is manufacturing pressure.
The genuine eligibility check asks for a last name, the last three digits of your SIN, and an email address. A request for the full SIN, date of birth, ID scans, or CRA credentials is a data harvest.
Filing a claim is free. A processing, verification, or expedite fee means fraud.
A one time passcode read aloud, forwarded, or typed into a third party site hands over your account.
Check the address carefully. The genuine site is https://www.breachsettlementcanada.kpmg.ca.
Anything ending in .info, .net, .co, .ca-claims, or a hyphenated variant of the KPMG name is not it.
Requests to move funds, buy gift cards, or receive a payout through e-transfer to a new recipient are not part of any settlement.
Reach the eligibility check only by typing https://www.breachsettlementcanada.kpmg.ca into the web browser. Do not use links from email, text, social media, or search advertisements.
If someone claims to be the administrator, hang up and contact breachsettlementcanada@kpmg.ca from the details on the official site.
Never provide a full Social Insurance Number to an inbound contact.
Sign in to CRA My Account by typing the address, confirm your direct deposit details and mailing address have not been changed, and enable multi factor authentication if it is not already on.
If you believe your information was exposed, place a fraud alert with Equifax Canada and TransUnion Canada.
Forward or print this email to anyone who handles correspondence, banking, or tax filings on a principal's behalf.
Any instruction arising from a settlement, refund, or government notice must be verified by an out of band call to a known number before any data or funds move.
Ask your IT provider to monitor for newly registered domains that combine your family or firm name with settlement, claim, refund, or CRA terms.
Quarantine newly registered sender domains and flag external mail referencing CRA settlements or class action payouts.
Report suspected scams to the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre at 1-888-495-8501 and preserve the original message headers rather than deleting them.
Change the password on any account whose credentials were entered, starting with CRA My Account and your email, and revoke active sessions.
If CRA credentials were disclosed, contact the CRA immediately and ask that the account be locked and reviewed for changes to direct deposit or address.
Report the exposure and ask for enhanced verification on outbound payments.
Contact Equifax Canada and TransUnion Canada.
Speak to your Richter Guardian team. We can help contain the incident, assess what was exposed, and coordinate monitoring.
Request a private consultation to find out whether Richter Guardian is a good fit for you.
Most families already understand physical home security. A monitored home security system watches the doors, the windows, and the driveway, and it alerts a real person the moment something looks wrong.
Few high-net-worth families would consider their primary residence unprotected in this way.
Yet the equivalent protection is often missing for the digital side of an executive's family life, where far more of their exposure now lives: within personal email accounts, mobile phones, computers, social media profiles, and financial credentials.
Richter Guardian is built around the same underlying idea as a home security system, just applied to a family's digital footprint.
It is worth walking through the comparison directly, because it makes clear what "protection" should include.
A home security system is only as strong as the size of its coverage. A system that only watches the front door leaves every other entry point open. This is why home security systems place sensors on every window, every door, and often the garage too.
Richter Guardian applies this same principle to an executive's digital life on the home and family front. Personal digital protection means every meaningful entry point is covered, not just the obvious one. This includes:
- Personal laptops, tablets and phones, which are frequently the least protected devices in a household.
- Personal and family email accounts, often the single most valuable target since they often double as the recovery method for banking and investment accounts.
- Social media accounts, which can be cloned or impersonated to reach family members, friends, or staff.
Just as an unmonitored side window undermines a home security system's front-door sensor, one unprotected personal device or account can undermine protection everywhere else.
A home security sign discourages some opportunistic activity, but it does not stop a determined intruder, and it certainly does not respond to one.
The value of a real home security system comes from continuous monitoring: sensors that are always active and a monitoring center that is always watching.
The digital equivalent is continuous monitoring for leaked credentials, impersonation, and malware:
- A stolen password sitting on the dark web is like a duplicated house key sitting in a stranger's pocket. It does nothing on its own, but it becomes dangerous the moment someone decides to use it.
- Ongoing dark web and credential monitoring means that exposure is caught before it turns into a break-in, rather than being discovered only after money or data is already gone.
When a home alarm is triggered, the value isn't only the alert. It's what happens next.
A monitoring centre verifies the situation and, if needed, contacts emergency services on the homeowner's behalf. Compare that to a security system that simply sends a phone notification and leaves the resident to figure out what to do.
With Richter Guardian, when an issue arises or clarification is required, our concierge support team contacts you in a secure, private and discreet manner. You can also contact us at any time. Either way, communication takes place through the Guardian mobile app, a phone call, or another agreed-upon channel.
Our Guardian professionals, also known as the Cyber Defence Desk, explain what’s happening in clear language and guide next steps in a way that fits into your broader wealth and risk strategies.
This matters most in the moment it's needed: when there's a convincing call, a strange pop-up, or an unexpected wire request.
When you know exactly who to speak with, and have those questions be answered by a real person, is the difference between a contained incident and a costly one.
Good home security doesn't rely on locks alone. It adds motion sensors, cameras, and perimeter alerts, so that suspicious activity is noticed even if no door has actually been breached yet.
The digital version of this is reputation and identity protection. A cloned social media profile or an impersonation attempt is a form of activity around the perimeter of a family's digital life, well before any account can be compromised.
Monitoring for that activity, and acting on it early, is what keeps a small warning sign from becoming a full-blown incident involving fraud or reputational harm.
Here is where the comparison becomes especially important for high-net-worth families with more than one residence, or with members living in different homes altogether.
A homeowner with a vacation property, or an adult child in a separate residence, would not consider that second home "covered" by the security system installed at the primary address. Each home needs its own protection.
The same is true digitally, and it is often overlooked.
A family's digital exposure does not stop at one address. It follows every family member:
- the adult child at university;
- the parent living independently; and
- the staff working across more than one property.
Each of these people and their accounts and devices represents a separate point of exposure, and each needs to be covered on its own, not assumed to be safe because "the family" has security somewhere.
This is why Richter Guardian's approach extends coverage across the full footprint of a family, not just one principal or one property.
Extended visibility across multiple households means that a family member living somewhere else entirely is not left outside the perimeter simply because they aren't under the same roof.
None of this is meant to suggest that digital executive protection and home security are the same thing, because they aren't.
The underlying logic that makes a home security system worth having is exactly the logic that should apply to a family's digital exposure: full coverage, continuous monitoring, a real response when something goes wrong, and protection that follows every member of the family, not just one address.
Families who wouldn't leave a single window unmonitored at home are, in many cases, leaving several digital windows wide open without realizing it.
Request a private consultation to find out whether Richter Guardian is a good fit for you.
Real estate wire fraud is a scam where criminals impersonate trusted parties to redirect money during a property transaction.
These transactions often involve large wire transfers, and time-sensitive communication between buyers, sellers, lawyers, real estate agents, title companies, notaries, and financial institutions.
Together, these factors make real estate transactions a prime target for fraud.
For high-net-worth individuals, and executives, the risks can be especially significant.
Property purchases and sales may involve large sums of money, multiple advisors, and sensitive personal or financial information. A single fraudulent email or payment can lead to substantial financial loss.
The most important rule is simple: before sending money, always verify wire instructions by phone using a trusted number you already have, not one provided in an email.
Real estate transactions remain a major target for fraud. In 2025, the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center reported more than 12,000 real estate fraud complaints and over $275 million in reported losses. This was higher than 2024, when losses were about $173 million.
These losses show how common and damaging real estate fraud can be. In many cases, the victim believes they are sending funds to a legitimate party, only to discover that the money was redirected to a fraudulent account.
Attackers often begin by gaining access to an email account involved in the transaction or by impersonating one of the parties. They may silently monitor the conversation and wait for the right moment to intervene.
Once attackers understand the details of the deal, they send a convincing email with fraudulent bank details that redirect the money to the attacker. Attackers may impersonate any party involved in the transaction, such as a real estate agent, lawyer, title company representative, or even the buyer or seller themselves.
Because the attacker may know specifics like dollar amounts, property addresses, and names of people involved, the message can look legitimate, making the email extremely convincing.
The most effective protection is independent verification. Before sending any wire transfer, call the intended recipient using a trusted phone number that was provided in person, saved previously, or found through an independently verified source.
Do not rely on contact information included in an email containing wire instructions. If an attacker controls the email conversation, they may also provide a fake phone number to “confirm” the fraudulent details.
This is especially important as AI voice cloning becomes more convincing. A phone call is only useful if the number is trusted. When in doubt, use a number you already know or independently verify the number through an official website or previously established contact.
The same approach should be used for any high-value payment, account change, or request involving sensitive financial information.
Be cautious of:
- Last-minute changes to wire instructions
- Pressure to wire immediately
- Email addresses that look slightly off, such as ‘titlecompany.co’ instead of ‘titlecompany.com’
- Request to confirm payment details only via email
- Unusual urgency, secrecy, or changes in communication style
- New bank account details that were not previously discussed
However, a well-crafted attack may not include any obvious warning signs. Rather than trying to decide whether an email “looks suspicious”, treat all wire instructions as unverified until they are confirmed by phone using a trusted number.
Before sending funds, take these steps:
1. Confirm the wire instructions by phone using a known, trusted number.
2. Verify the recipient's name, bank name, account number, routing number, and payment amount.
3. Do not use phone numbers or links provided in the same email as the wire instructions.
4. Be especially cautious about last-minute changes.
5. If anything feels unusual, pause the transaction and contact your advisor, bank, or security team.
Richter Guardian can help reduce the risk of wire fraud through proactive monitoring, personal cybersecurity guidance, and expert support to secure accounts, devices, credentials, and identity-related information.
If you are unsure about a transaction, receive suspicious payment instructions, or want added protection before a high-value transfer, contact us.
Request a private consultation to find out whether Richter Guardian is a good fit for you.